Entertainment

Kangana Ranaut seeks exemption from court appearance in defamation case by Javed Akhtar


Mumbai: Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut on Friday moved a plea searching for everlasting exemption from showing earlier than a Justice of the Peace court right here in a defamation criticism lodged by veteran lyricist Javed Akhtar.

In her plea, filed by way of advocate Rizwan Siddiquee, Ranaut has sought everlasting exemption from court appearance on the bottom that she must journey to totally different elements of India and likewise abroad to fulfil her skilled commitments.

The plea additional mentioned attending the court frequently would require the actor to journey miles to Mumbai from totally different work places, thereby inflicting her undue hardships. The applicant will thus not solely be unable to satisfy her skilled commitments, but additionally each she and manufacturing homes will incur enormous monetary losses, it added.

The court allowed her to skip in-person appearance for the day (June 25) and posted the everlasting exemption plea for listening to on July 27.

Akhtar (76) had filed the criticism in the Justice of the Peace’s court in final November claiming the actor had made defamatory statements towards him in a tv interview, which allegedly broken his status. In his criticism, Akhtar claimed that had made defamatory feedback towards him in an interview by dragging his identify whereas referring to a “coterie” present in Bollywood, following the demise of filmstar Sushant Singh Rajput in June final 12 months.

The Justice of the Peace had directed the Mumbai police to hold out a preliminary probe into the criticism. In February, the police submitted a report back to the court, saying an offence of defamation was made out towards Ranaut.

On March 1, Justice of the Peace R R Khan had issued a bailable warrant towards Ranaut after she failed to seem earlier than the court as per earlier instructions.

Later, her warrant was cancelled after Ranaut furnished a money bail of Rs 20,000 and a surety of Rs 15,000. Earlier, she had additionally moved the periods court to quash the authorized proceedings and summons issued towards her by the Justice of the Peace court. The periods court had dismissed her utility.



You may also like

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *